911 and 77 (21)
This category is for articles which are in response to Project Camelot's content.
From time to time I have a distinct and different viewpoint that may be of help or interest to those who like me follow with great interest Project Camelot productions.
Naturally I don't necessarily agree with everything but in fact I do concur with much or nearly all of it.
I am not in any privileged positon; I do not have 'inside' information. But, on the other hand, what I have come to understand, over the years, over the decades, as a result of fairly continuous interest and solitary research about strange subjects, some of which are also covered by Bill and Kerry, is sometimes very far ahead of average or layman's knowledge.
I was a "UFO believer" in the early 60s when talk of UFOs was unusual, books on the subject rare and very limited in scope, and, well, talk of "Aliens" never mind "alien abductions", implants, MIBs or the hybridisation program was virtually unheard of.
People might possibly entertain the notion of "little green men" as an amusing idea naturally linking from "UFO" discussions but as far as anything intelligent or enquiring? No, I never really encountered that in anyone. I lost interest in the 70s and 80s pretty much. One reason being that I was confused by the physicality or non-physicality of the phenomenon and another being the total lack of any good information especially in books. Nowadays, that information gap has been filled, not only are there a few good books but the internet if alive with intelligent, accurate and very useful information - so my interest has re-awoken especially as things are very much 'hotting up'.
People, generally, don't really want to know the truth; they say they do but they usually don't (whether 'it's out there' or not) but really prefer 'comfort information' by which I mean they really want to be reassured that everything is under control and monsters don't really exist - this goes, and I am serious, for genius scientists as well as immature adults and everyone in between too. This is why the media doesn't deal with it except as entertainment (let's all have a laugh at this silly idea type programs and writings).
I don't say this as an insult or out of persistent frustration in trying to discuss serious matter with people, but as a consistent observation.
So the shadow goverments have an easy time and a head start keeping stuff secret when it's scary stuff. On top of that they hardly need disinfo agents because most people will adopt that work for them for free and without even being aware of what they are doing. You will see lots of people seeming to genuinely want to know the truth but all the while castigating and insulting those who already have it.
This is, essentially, why I don't 'engage' with others on the subject. I think I have written an article that explains what I am getting at quite well which explains how people may state that they have a strong interest to discover a truth about eg telepathy, but when the evidence is presented to them they will destroy the evidence. Once you have seen this kind of thing demonstrated clearly then you realize that argument, I mean reasoning argument not the unpleasant ego-argument (but those too of course) is clearly of little use in trying to get people to understand some strange aspect of reality.
This has to be mentioned in passing because this whole spectrum tends to leave people frustrated and even depressed because it's a lot like banging your head against a brick wall except that brick walls are more flexible and understanding when it comes to a confrontation with terrible or really scary truth, and they don't keep backing away from it either nor do they suddenly come at you with malice in heart and mind.
Of course Project Camelot content goes beyond UFOs and Aliens - but the same observatons apply.
I would say this to anyone who is puzzled about the whole thing, this 'bundle' of strange ideas, if your immediate reaction is to reject and say "no way" then ask yourself how much you really want to know the truth and how much you really want to hide from it.
Not only is "Truth Stranger Than Fiction" but "It can be pretty damn scary too" - however, despite how scary it is or sometimes is, it is better to face our fears, to face the scary truth than it is, than to turn a blind eye out of fear. Often the scary factor has been invented or exaggerated out of typical ignorance. (Take the film "Fire in the sky" for instance - the scariest parts were added in).
I would say, we have got to the terrible, nightmare, scenario stage that, to me, we are now in as well as bordering on, at present, because, in large part, intelligent adults have CHOSEN not to pay much serious attention to the signs, signals, evidence and reasons to be very interested and in the case of 9/11 and the like, very suspicious.
We have, collectively chosen to abandon curiosity, interest and vigilence when it comes to these subjects. Because we behave like that the policy of governments to hide the truth can be justified on the basis that the people don't want to know. Therefore the really nasty stuff that these same governments instigate can also be justified. In that sense we, the people, have brought the 'real mess', our current psychopathic society and dichotomised governments, upon ourselves by that choice, to hide from the truth.
That is not an act of bravery but an act of cowardice, collective cowardice, and, it seems to me, the monster, the extended longterm result of this cowardice, is this terrible and nightmare situation that is now unfolding. So when you realize that, for instance, 9/11 was an inside job and that 7/7 was too and linked and then after that you realize that the people in general don't want to know and will put up a fight to resist knowing, then isn't it inevitable that things can only get worse?
That is why Project Camelot is so important. Bill and Kerry, like me, believe that truth is important and getting to hidden truth and exposing it is very important. So I am pleased to add this new category to my growing collection.
By Paul E. Coughlin
SaneThinking.com
8 July 2008