911 and 77 (21)
By 91177 I mean 9/11 and 7/7 and by those I mean, if you still are not sure, the New York twin tower atrocity and the London bombs of July 2005. Let us just gloss over the fact that it was a triple tower atrocity and not just the twin towers.
In January 2007 I went from a long stable assumption that 9-11, and it's copycat cousin 7-7, the UK version, were just more or less what the official line, The Story, told us, to discovering that I along with millions of others had been completely and utterly duped by a huge criminal conspiracy of a nightmare kind.
I think that this issue is simply too important to mention and move on regardless. Too, too important. I just have to spend a chunk of my time devoted to sharing with each of you some of the things I have discovered so that you too will open your eyes to what is now taking place and what has been taking place for several decades at least. I foresee myself engaged in this task, this monumental task, this impossible task, for weeks or months, maybe years to come. I ask you to question and search and re-search for the real answers, to be suspicious, to be willing and fair minded when coming across incredible, unbelievable, evidence that you decide must be true. If you also choose to support me - I can do with it - this will be appreciated.
I make no exaggeration when I speak of it as a nightmare.
But it is only a nightmare because we are all going along with it as if we are all in a hypnotic state.
And, you know what, I actually now believe that too may be no exaggeration either. It is really the case, it now seems to me, that because of the enormity of 911 and the skill in thoroughly controlling the presentation of it to us, that we have all accepted The Story without the questioning, without applying the scrutiny, without applying the vigilence that we should. I believe that this is what has happened; we have been stunned into accepting "The Story" without question. It is a very dangerous situation we are all in because of it. We really need to make good that terrible mistake before it is too late.
There is abundant evidence that is reliable, reliable enough to make us extremely suspicious of the official explanation, "The Story", and that should make us try to work out what really happened but we don't question and we don't 'see' any of that evidence. I cannot account for this, this selective blindness, a term I use for want of a better one, except and unless we have been put in a kind of trance about it, that a kind of spell has been cast upon us all. Why else, how else could any of us not see some of the simple evidence and realise it's terrible meaning? The meaning is that we have let a monster out of it's cage and it's wreaking it's destruction; why don't we see this?
Off the top of my head I can think of several photographs, any one of which is enough on it's own to enable the penny to drop for any thinking, intelligent adult. So why doesn't that penny drop?
I think it has to do with what I have called "Enormity Of Meaning" or just EOM. Now I don't know if I came up with this idea myself or it is one I read that someone else came up with; it's been one of my pet basic ideas for many years, too many to remember how I derived it.
EOM is a phenomenon that humans exhibit naturally when the information they are handling in more or less a reasonable way begins to take on such great meaning, such powerful meaning, that this process of reasoning is replaced and stifled by emotional takeover. I have noticed this happen repeatedly and the clue is that the reasons being spoken, being put into words, no longer merit the word reason any more. In fact the right word for what lies behind this new pseudo reasoning is really emotion. I said that was the clue, my mistake, that IS the phenomenon itself, the clue is that the reason is blatantly unreasonable.
I go into EOM really because I listened (infowars.com and Alex Jones) to a BBC producer answering questions and putting forth his thoughts regarding his BBC Conspiracy Files pseudo documentary on 9-11 conspiracy theories aired in February 2007. He came across as sincere and oblivious to the obvious and I can only conclude that he is in this EOM state or that he is otherwise in a kind of hynotic state about it.
This kind of self censorship that the BBC has exhibited, this self induced blindness that seems to be all too prevalent in the media among otherwise sensible and intelligent people, is far more effective, far more efficient in silencing the truth and concealing or rubbishing Reasons To Be Suspicious , than any State organised HQ of Information Control. But one just has to ask does just such a headquarters of Information Control exist - really a centre that constantly works to maintain certain truth is kept secret and certain absurdities are maintained and nurtured, because, simply, the evidence suggests that we do have such an agency.
So, if you like to dismiss us who are no longer "The Story" supporters but "Inside Job" believers as conspiracy nuts then consider for a moment this: All the indications are that these agencies, government and military, are ruthless and lawless and it follows that, if they can, they WILL unplug the internet. This is because they have a strong need, just as all criminally minded psychopaths do, to keep secret their behaviour. To control the media is not only what the evidence reveals they have mastered exceptionally well but must surely be followed by the unplugging of the internet except of course for their own use. Is such a thing possible? I wouldn't mind betting that all the key routers, the vital junctions of the internet, which all run on firmware, have a tiny internal computer program, that upon receiving a small message or a sequence of messages, will cease to handle any IP (Internet Protocol) address except for military and, maybe, government ones. It's as simple as that to do; that is all it would take to unplug the internet to everyone but the military.
Does such extra firmware undocumented code exist in the routers?
Practicably there is no real way of knowing for sure unless it actually is commanded to run; then we will know or rather, then we can suspect that is why the internet no longer works. Is this scenario just a paranoid fear without foundation in fact? Well, maybe, but it is based on the assessment I have made in recent weeks of the mindset behind 911 (and London's 77). Those with access to the firmware could probably analyse it to see if it can all be accounted for. I don't say it is the case but I say it would be the case if these agencies thought they could do it and get away with it and I say that if the internet can be unplugged this is how it could be done and still leave it useable by the military which is, after all, what it was designed for in the first place.
Perhaps I shouldn't embark on this because it doesn't have the certainty factor that exists for most of what I write but I believe that you are able to distinguish between, and apprecitate these two kinds of suppositon on my part. I do not claim any kind of certainty and want to emphasize that point but feel that it would be a great pity if I had to exclude such an important idea merely because it fails in my usual standard of high evidential backing to support it.
The crimes of 9-11 themselves were perpetrated at the highest levels of at least some major government agencies as well as military ones and the ongoing control of information especially of Reasons To Be Suspicious, good evidence for the Inside Job, indicates that those more or less autonomous agencies have managed to not only get out of the box that is meant to contain and curtail their powers but have succeeded in causing insane havoc in other countries where no genuine reason exists to account for it, so that the Middle East is being subjected to war, war crimes and atrocities that are the mark of a military machine no longer held in check by right-minded political leaders.
None of us is powerless, especially while the internet is still open for business. It is possible to put these insane people, this New Nazism Plus Gang, back in the box - that should be a priority.
Paul E. Coughlin, March 2007
![[Valid RSS]](valid-rss.png "Validate my RSS feed")
